World War III and the New World Order

The nature of World War III invites much speculation. The primary fear is of a nuclear catastrophe between the USA or Russia, with a range of other possibilities with proliferation of weapons. John F. Kennedy pointed to Kashmir as a tinder-box and that is certainly relevant. More recently, we have been subject to a whole range of network-sabotage scenarios where interference in the systems we are dependent on becomes critical. We might also have to consider the growth of private armies and huge transnational corporations affiliated with the security-industrial-military-pharmaceutical (SIMP) complex. As I noted in my book TechBondAge,

“We are living in the SIMP society and we are the Simpsons.”

Yet my hypothesis or explanation and origins of technocracy, transhumanism and global governance systems for a NWO implies a limited conventional range of options. If my hypothesis is correct then the unfolding war should be predictable. Certainly nuclear war is high on the list as a risk. I did say beforehand that there would be war in Ukraine the year it began and before the US election that there would be war with Iran (see Countering The Governance of Evil). I mentioned Monkeypox a year before it became a thing (see Q&A on Techbondage live stream). I wrote a book, Blue Lies September, which involved emergency curfews or lockdowns in London before Covid for other reasons and so on. How might WWIII unfold in my hypothesis?

To summarise my position. I believe that the movement to global governance is largely pursued through the vehicle of the Atlanticist Axis being the core of the old British Empire refracted through the USA and ‘English-speaking world’ and the neo-imperial translation through global financial nodes in the Middle East, Caribbean and elsewhere. Switzerland has been critical as the centre of internationalism through the Protestant cultural and then commercial connections. Its influence is astonishing. We can trace the global ambition back to Francis Bacon and John Dee. The allegiance of this Axis is not to the countries which finance it but the corporate-complex which controls it. The empires of Europe never went away but transmuted into networks- scientific, technical, financial, transportational, communicational and cultural. The idea of the New World Order was primarily identified by H.G. Wells (see the following talk The Life and Work of H.G. Wells). This is called a conspiracy theory though it is well-documented and repeated. A global governance system by technologists or scientists for elites primarily through bio-medical means is the promise. The idea manifests or is suggested in the vast corpus of his work. In particular, the world would be ruined before the new order comes into being. It would be out of chaos the order comes. The war would be against the nation-state, religion and the family. It is well on the way.

Wells hated Catholicism and for most of the time hated Jewry. If his plan is what is in fact unfolding, then the growing claims that it is Jewish-led are incredibly difficult to maintain beyond their existing severe implausibility. Rather it might be that the vehicle wants to camouflage its contents and controllers. Remember that Churchill was involved in the construction in the early part of the 20^th century of a plan which involved imperial re-configuration of the Holy Land following long British interest and even peculiar ideas that made the upper class a lost tribe of Israel. He wrote about Jews he thought were good and others he thought were bad. Trotsky would be in the latter camp for example. It really depended on whether they were for the UK-US aims. Dispensationalism was arguably also an imperial construction calculated to support securing the nodal point of Israel as a continental crux or cross. It informs US policy today.

Wells wanted to bomb Rome and by that he really meant the Vatican. This was supposedly because of his love for peace. But Catholicism must go, as a competitive claimant to global power. We might then ask why Islam has not been so explicitly feared as Catholicism is. The answer is simple enough. From a tactical left position and a transnational corporate right, Islam can be set-up to de-hegemonise formerly Christian countries which might be able to mount opposition to global ambitions. In addition, the institutions that animate the Catholic world would have to be infiltrated and assaulted from without so that dispirited they collapse. Protestant internationalism and the New Rome of Geneva supported this.

Does that mean that Islam rises and forms a new Caliphate in the vacuum? Not in the NWO. What you want to destroy you first expand. As it would be hostile to religion, it would use Islam as a battering-ram. European cohesion is defeated through military adventurism by NATO in Islamic countries. That causes huge population-flows into Europe. No Islamic cohesion manifests in the existing Arab countries despite the apparent welcome-mat in Europe. If a post-national, post-familial, post-religious world is the objective, then fomentation of Christian-secular versus Islamic-Arab communities would de-stabilise Europe. That instability would assist in justification of wider war whilst accomplishing population-reduction that the NWO has always approved of.

As the NWO evolves it has less affinity to national interests. Thus the NATO infrastructure becomes a precursor of world governance straying long from the North Atlantic. The Project for the New American Century was the playbook. But those players may be played by the older players behind the scenes. Frontmen actors are seldom the true actors.

When Islam is extended with a weak, original base in Arab countries because it has been bombed by the Western powers and technically controlled thereby, then the West could shift. Then Muslims could be the target in their extended state. They could be painted as a common enemy within the West, within Europe, Canada, Australia and so on. The Chinese and Russians could be brought in. The resulting triumph would lead to an argument for global government with Chinese, Russian and Western co-operation at the elite levels. China would supply the experience of social credit AI-Governance. There will be agreements behind the scenes and double-crosses.

Alternatively, the West intends to displace Russian and/or China. If the transmuting British Empire model is correct, the pattern is easily explained. The present tensions in the world, especially in Ukraine and Crimea, Israel, Kashmir and Afghanistan are merely an unfolding of the 19^th century Great Game. Then Russia was the future enemy. The Trotskyist elements in the US sustained an anti-Russian front based on opposition to Stalinism and were assumed into the neo-con movement for the Deep State. On that model, Ukraine was critical and the US deliberately intervened over a decade ago. A few years ago a Palestinian asked my opinion about the future of Palestine. I said it would probably be destroyed and used as a node of ‘globetechgov’ or a prototype for neo-imperial technocracy. That is looking more likely.

The modern continuation of a desire to replace Russia can be seen in statements by George Soros. But before that, the work of Zbigniew Brzezinski sketches the plan for change through Ukraine and the creation of a technetronic society. Ukraine was critical in The Grand Chessboard which followed the Great Game. The Russians are well aware. If Russia is invaded or de-stabilised then the Atlanticist forces can stretch around the world and China is containable and even ripe for conquest unless a Sino-Atlanticist pact is completed or the result. Islam is wielded as a tool to de-stabilise Russia from within up from Syria inwards with a war from the West through NATO aggression from Europe. Sweden, Finland and the Baltic can quickly become a new front. That would explain the rise in military investment. Fredrick Forsyth sketched the significance of the agricultural production of the Ukraine in the plot of his thriller The Devil’s Alternative. In one variation of this scenario, the Russians could set the Islamic states against Europe in a defensive measure.

The other strategy is ongoing and parallel. The global bodies are used to enshrine the NWO through a biomedical directorate as Wells suggested. This is the WHO and bodies that set international regulations. In conjunction with a multilateral policy of global leverage through tactical wars, claims about Extra-Terrestrial invasions, AI-regulation, pandemics, meteors, global warming and so on, power and sovereignty is transferred to central institutions and a combined force from NATO and in the meantime Russia and/or China are co-opted. The global public suffers a global technical coup. The parallel strategy can supplement the military ambitions and strategies until one triumphs. The end is a global technocratic totalitarian state or the State of the World as the WEF called it. There can be some accommodation between remaining groups as appropriate. An accommodation between the Chinese Communist Party and the West is certainly plausible. For example a new global currency based on rare earths could be part of that. The desired result is an AI-governed world.

China is critical but maybe not in the exact way we think. In 1992, Deng Xiaoping famously said “The Middle East has oil. China has rare earths.” This was the future. China has them in abundance. The West would seem to need them for the infrastructure of the global, digital zoo. Some more have been gained in Ukraine and the recent assimilation of Sweden. The NWO needs those rare earths to build the technetronic society. China has maintained coherence, been flexible, expanded commercially, commanded strategic infrastructure and developed whilst ignoring the Western suicidal policies supposedly inspired by communism or crony capitalism. It could not have done so without technology-transfer. People advocating the technocracy supported this just as electricity know-how was transferred to the Bolsheviks from the USA. It is needed for something like what Lilly conceived as the Solid-State Entity. Maybe the West made more explicit plans with China beforehand.

It could be argued that Islam is gaining power and has legitimate ambitions to world power. However that supposed power is thin strategically. Rather it will be used as leverage. The constant implosion of Western discipline necessary to create the chaos for the calls to more certain leadership will make Sharia more attractive. But when the truly secular power emerges, it will be intolerant of that tactical play. Already Natoists are calling for big prisons to deal with chaos they contribute towards. You will hear more of the need to put an end to chaos even before bigger chaos comes. The simplest idea from the work of Wells is that the world will be razed and former structures erased so the ones who orchestrated the demolition and deconstruction conceptually and actually can build back better a new world or new state of the world. The financial system is already available for a controlled demolition. This policy explains better the persistent pursuit of endless war in a way inconsistent with the interests of the provisioning publics they notionally represent.

Interestingly, the most surprising corroboration of this analysis appears in a constant chain of apparitions of the Virgin Mary, especially from LaSalette onwards through Fatima and in prophecies from people like Marie-Julie Jahenny and Malachi Martin. There the phenomenon of atheistic materialism is the unifying mischief. But that’s another story.

The end is technocracy, tech-totalitarianism and a Promethean posthuman world which involves humans being destroyed, assimilated and altered. Churchill told us of the coming of the empire of the mind. The war is on us through all means. Many scientific theorists have told us. I believe the scientists on this one.