Robert F. Kennedy Jnr: Wearing Thin and Wearing Things

Speaking at a hearing before a Subcommittee to members of Congress Robert F. Kennedy Jnr said he hopes every American is wearing a wearable within four years. In one way this is a shocking statement from someone portrayed as a counter-cultural health advocate. The interventionist public health justification is one he has expressed great scepticism over especially in relation to vaccines. Yet he expounds health as a justification for a mass campaign of monitoring technology. Using public funds to promote mass public-private campaigns of technological proliferation with direct privacy and public control possibilities is not consistent with an individual orientated advocacy.

In addition to the possibility of a questionable lack of benefits, and the dangers of state surveillance is an environmental question. All such devices and the systems in which they operate are costly and resource-demanding. The constant mechanophilic response to social problems is not the answer.  Technosolutionism seems inconsistent with previous concerns about biometric control. Is he not concerned about electromagnetic radiation anymore? What about e-waste and rare earths? Oh, I forgot, you may have a new source in Ukraine if the US gets a deal. Then again, maybe if weapons were kept at home, many more people would stay healthy and alive.

Many health professionals are extremely sceptical about the use of such technology to achieve the stated goals. But obviously the greatest concern is about the surveillance danger. Public policy, public security and public health are the common legal exceptions to rules which restrain intervention in our lives. However, the exception has become the rule. Bombing foreign countries is justified on spurious grounds with tenuous connections to actual dangers. The hypothetical chain of causation is much easier to sketch than a real-world one. Emergency exceptions become hair-trigger opportunities and standard justifications beyond the scope of original conceptions.     

Kennedy has indicated by this statement that he is all in on what I call the Plantation of Automatons of the Empire of Scientism, leading to TechBondAge and AI-posthumanism and AI-govnerveance. While his rhetoric on health is impressive, he is equally at home with the new military-industrial complex of the next generation and obviously can work in the transhumanist, posthumanist political milieu which is dedicated to total technological control. This techno-structure is based on an aggressive interventionist ethos including ultimately in our body and consciousness. 

The embrace of AI by governments in the US and elsewhere is calculated to ensure systems of global governance. The progression from mass external devices (mobiles) to wearables will proceed to implants. The goal is the brain-cloud interface using nanotechnology as I have explained in Ai-govnerveance. Many new advances in technology are accompanied by a qualification that it may give rise to conspiracy theories. This is a necessary move because the desire to control our consciousness is a conspiracy and it must have a theory that justifies it. The theory is ultimately a neo-imperial imperative of how to control people globally by technology predicated on a Promethean idea and the power it promises. It is revealed by a constant trajectory that is painful in its predictability once appreciated.  I hear AI experts refuting conspiracy theories that may come when new medical nanotech is announced and find a remarkable corroboration of the fears I have expressed. Why should they be concerned about conspiracy theories about nanotech?

Already the plan has engaged in preemptive dissent discrediting of honest critics by powerful actors to protect powerful actors with the implication that critique will be paranoia. The shifting of the burden of proof and re-framing occurs in the desert mirage of genuine AI ethics. The next generation of warfare is against autonomous human beings. The net is closing on free will of human consciousness. Drones will fill your skies under the collar of satellites colouring the heavens. Spurious justifications for interventions which ignore the causes and creation of conditions from monstrous transnational corporations, intelligence agencies and international bodies, address some symptoms as a subterfuge for surveillance and final control. We can no longer ignore the obvious noose-tightening nor excuse the collaboration. The hypocrisy is astounding. You may become thin wearing a Government thing. Kennedy is wearing thin. The shackles are being forged by Hephaestus and his automatons. We face a new form of slavery, whose calculated, clean and supposedly convivial contexts camouflage an enterprise endeavouring to control human conscious centrally by AI on a planetary scale.

What now is ‘medical freedom’?  Apart from complex technologies that reveal what is going on inside us, the good-old fashioned way is to watch what people actually say and do and look for consistency or inconsistency. Many will be sensing a strong odour and feeling a very bitter taste in their mouths as they worry whether they are getting the hemlock with the hooch. I think Homer Simpson might be a better source now of health advice.