Defining the Mono-Revolution and Sili-Transubstantiation

Modern revolution most often is one meta-phenomenon

Like your body works by the invisible magic of homeostasis, so did Western society. Jesus and the Holy Spirit were supported by Mary. The Virgin Mary was the invisible force of homeostasis and coherence in the Church and Western society. The dynamic force of revolution i.e. the turning wheel, that became the Red Wheel, needs to run over the mystic body whose spiritual integrity was kept under Her silent presence. Anti-homeostatic forces deconstruct, destroy, destabilise, disrupt and disenchant in order to establish a new mechanical mother The Matrix, the new womb simulacrum.

If one examines the actual history of the Western Legal Tradition in its modern form, we see clearly that it emerged from the Church. The legal history of Marx and other German theorists has been justifiably undermined by commentators. They simply did not comprehend the complexity of legal relations in their analysis of the feudal system. Many rights that were protected through the common law and equity came from pressure and principles of the Church and unique legal vehicles like trusts. The influence is clear in the Magna Carta. But Marxism put the Church as a purely economic player peddling phantoms at the centre of the feudal structure.

There are not many modern revolutions but one. The meta-phenomenon of modern revolution is a process of rejection of God. It manifests as a permanent and perpetual revolution against the governance of society with rules derived in the West from Christ. In particular the object of attack is on the Church founded by Peter. It is no accident that St. Peters, St. Petersburg or the Cathedral of St. Pierre in Geneva were key nodes. The revolution aimed to sever that connection through the Reformation and continued through the America Revolution to reduce God through theism and deism. It went further to a spurious Supreme Being in the French Revolution. A few weeks after the Festival of the Supreme Being, Carmelite nuns were being guillotined. The Russian Revolution made clear that the process leads to Godlessness for it is driven by that desire. Atheism and agnosticism has largely been driven by this movement. Communism and crony capitalism are united in this single revolution and as the Popes warned us, it has insinuated itself within the Catholic Church. It operates by attacking icons, churches, Mary, Christ, Peter’s Church and undermining all concepts of God.

We know God is the target because revolutionaries consistently so state if you examine what they say and do. What we have failed to see is the unified anti-divine phenomenon characterised by its anti-homeostatic, spirit and societal deconstruction and reconstruction. It manifests both in Mammon and Marx. It leads to our translation into silicon, attacking carbon and life itself for total posthuman control of old life, nature and old humans whilst masquerading as its Saviour in a Singularity. That is why we have Silicon Valley and why leading scientists like Bernal, a century ago, told us we would be turned into silicon in the posthuman vision. The revolution varies with violent force in one iteration and apparently harmless fun and entertainment on the other, often characterised as being merely silly. People then think perpetual persistent revolution is a function of lack of intelligence and mistake rather than the sinister intelligence take it is. The Christ heist in the zeitgeist is no joke but a tryst with the anti-Christ woke.

God speaks as a whistling on a gentle air to the chosen few. But the divine order has no obligation to disclose itself beyond its self-evident presence in the fine-tuned universe we are remarkably part of as well as manifestation, revelation and Incarnation through existing history. If an all-powerful being were to stand ten-mile high and command you to be good, you would legitimately say I have no free will! The example would not be good, example being the best teacher of being. People ask how can we have evil or how can God let it be? Therefore God must not exist or is evil. But most of what we term ‘evil’ comes from people and often specifically from people who reject coherent doctrines. That religion supposedly caused most wars in history is another canard trotted out. The people who say they do not believe and will not serve God are the greatest believers and servants of man-made certainty even it that certainty proves wrong. But the nature of that error makes the participants intent on dragging others with them as the only power left is a destructive one.

Western civilisation and Christendom have been targets of an ongoing revolution that sometimes assumes civil power and other times opposes it in mannered oscillation. The Revolution is defined by opposition to God and Christ and thus fits into an overall story of a fallen and rebellious angel and a number of falls as the start of a process of revolution. Revolution must address the worldview it opposes and in doing so paradoxically may vindicate or corroborate the authority thereof. This becomes critical especially for the Catholic Church and those who feel it is under attack by infiltration by forces intending to remove opposition to a new order.

It is not an original observation to identify a continuous rebellion or revolution against the idea of a spiritual hierarchy, cosmic order, natural law, divine order, logos or God. It is not original to note this rebellion underlies the whole cosmogony and theology of monotheism following on from Greek, Jewish and other ideas. This conflict underlies many spiritual traditions. While rebellion is a constant aspect of normal existence, in modern times the protesting modern nihilist defined their apocalyptic and millennial world in contrast to the order they denied or repudiated. The language of God and gods was subsumed in a Promethean, Ahrimanic, Luciferian and Satanic perspective complemented by a left-brained, technoscientific, hyper-materialist and sorcerous intent. Opponents of the existing monotheistic order made it about that mistaken religious and spiritual dimension as they shifted the eternal promise to a future earthly paradise and utopia. Appropriation of religious iconography, practices, motifs and methods is consistent and necessary in the materialist struggle. While open in the communist argument, the anti-God, anti-spiritual, anti-religious, anti-Christian approach is more subtle and insidious in Western contexts, albeit helped by affiliations to Russia and China and radical movements within industrial nodes. There were two main strands that promoted rejection of monotheism, spiritual hierarchy, a comprehensive medieval worldview and the need to reflect objective values associated therewith in systems of governance and be willing to defend them. One was an open, honest, atheistic, agnostic, rational, scientific, empirical, sceptical and pagan approach which claims a long affinity with coherent sense of philosophy such as Stoicism or Indigenous thinking and indicates values legitimately claimed from heroic, historical and cultural evidence. A second however is a competing scientistic hierarchy which seeks empire often with alternative, esoteric, occult or mythic claims to spiritual hierarchy and even ones involving them which are fascinated with power, will, desire to control by engineering and which can utilise the former disposition to attain its goals. Thus science can appear to be the former whilst being the latter. That was something C.S. Lewis. Tolkien and Steiner noted in their work.

A parallel claim to comprehensive explanation is necessary to explain the changeling when God is excluded or declared dead. The monomyth associated with Joyce and Joseph Campbell then becomes a manifestation of the ‘I will not serve’ of Stephen Daedalus. It does not say there is nothing nor no superior will but that there is nothing above their power to exercise their own will and if it there is it is explicable in natural, physical terms - just like how they got there in the first place. It is a product of Protestant Enlightenment Orientalism and a sense of Promethean rebellion. Such revolution can only occur in a society where Christ has been critical and political freedom is the norm. The preoccupation with level of industrial development as a necessary precondition of revolution was a placeholder for a liberal society in whose compost and conditions the mycelium of revolution could grow. Those societies inevitably had a Christian base indicating the true adversary. The übermensch predated Nietzsche insofar as it was mentioned by Goethe in Faust. Faust is a mono-revolutionary as is Nietzsche. But originally Faust knew where he was going before Goethe subverted the outcome. The monomyth presents appearance of comprehension of the gods or God but subverts it into a licence to ‘follow your bliss.’ Jung assists the exploration but views God as a projection. Monomythical blessed becomes Luciferian spiritual bliss. That complements the Ahrimanic attitude Steiner notes whereby we are reduced to the material. Odd manifestations of the monomyth arguably in the mono-revolutionary tradition include Teilhard de Chardin and some of the Russian Cosmists that re-package Christianity in a monomind. We then begin to get a myth of posthuman control and a ‘butterfly revolution’ instead. Recall that Musk said new technology could turn humans into butterflies. He thought AI is the butterfly also. I’d rather be a human thanks.

The panorama of complex interactions in a global context requires some simplification. People are asking what to do without being willing to analyse what the problem is. More specifically, I will argue in my forthcoming book that the revolution against the Catholic Church (and Orthodox) is at the heart of this (what I term) mono-revolution. It is not defined merely by opposing monotheism, as adversaries may claim a new single God, i.e. Theistic Satanism or AI. Whether you hate the Catholic Church or not is irrelevant to the argument on continuity. There is a very strong case that the mono-revolution has now moved to the centre of institutions of the Catholic Church in a penultimate stage, pending ultimate resolution. Thus the mono-revolution may be defined and therefore incorporate many processes of revolution, particularly in the last 500 years, where it has been driven by anti-metaphysical realignment from the vertical to the horizontal. It becomes materialist and scientistic based on an Enlightenment sense of autonomy, secularism, anti-clericalism, Gnosticism or alternatively a new Promethean metaphysical resistance or both. Here is a definition and description.

Defining the concept of mono-revolution

Mono-revolution is the unifying process of permanent diverse modern revolutions to diminish monotheistic governance under God. It is specifically addressed to the ancient, apostolic or historic Christian Church and associated social hierarchies. The revolutionary model reflects an original heavenly revolt and is characterised by a destructive, deconstructive, anti-homeostatic means which dictates direction by machine control into an AI meta-revolution as divine simulacrum and Luciferian Singularity.

The transnational corporate aspect of the mono-revolution achieves a dreadful homogeneity and global standardisation at a new level of iteration whilst claiming diversity. Mono-revolution is anti-theological, anti-human and anti-cultural homogeneity. It uses heterogeneity and anti-cultural homogeneous plans to erode coherent constituencies of potential counter-revolution to global governance and digital assimilation of humans into the network. Heterogeneity is also an anti-homeostatic tactic to create insecurity and chaos by destabilisation and cultural atomisation necessary to secure technical homogeneity, standardisation and interoperability in a totally-surveilled society. We might call them anti-homeostactics. These promote semantic overload and confusion in a destabilising flux. ‘You’ve been tying your shoelaces wrong all you life.’ ’So you thought a woman could not….”

It does not allow cultural homogeneity in a stable form but perpetuate difference it creates and magnifies. That is the technique of colonisations and management by division, especially effective where the supplying force of colonialisation (e.g. Protestantism) begins to experience its own sacrifice and does not realise it is fodder for the machine that uses it. The Singularity and assimilation of humans into the machine through mobiles, wearables and inserts, digital convergence, ID, currency and the circular economy totally-surveilled is the outcome. The rejection of God needs a simulation, substitute, simulacrum, Al-seeing eye, re-creation.

Thus the Royal Family in Britain, many Prime Ministers or Presidents could be engaged in the mono-revolution just as the Militant Tendency and Neocons (inspired by Trotsky) were. The anti-homeostatic nature allows both materialist thrusts combust in a destruction of existing systems in the permanent revolution identifiable as creative destruction in crony capitalism and a continual worldwide revolution in communism. The continuous dynamo and generator symbolised it and silicon is the next stage to recreate us, rejecting and translating carbon life in sili-transubstantiation to hell. The permanent mono-revolution will lead there.

Sili-Transubstantiation is the posthuman or demonic intent to translate all life into a silicon-based form to make a new God, simulacrum or Singularity, de-divinising humans as it does so often using nonsense, absurdity, incoherence and infantile provocation as a process of distraction, disorientations and disenchantment to corrode existing institutions, especially as they directly or indirectly relate to a divine base.

If you think there are no spiritual entities or demons, ask yourself why so many scientists use the analogy and believe in their ability to create and summon new entities and intelligences, especially disembodied one. Study John Dee. The thoughts of John C. Lilly and creation of a Solid State Entity corroborate the unfolding reality we encounter, as does the idea of Lucifer and Ahriman as explored by Steiner. The turning of life into non-life is a reverse of turning bread and wine to Christ.

That comes from the permanent nature of a revolt against God and need to disrupt normal forces of continuity, correction, continual improvement and reform. Mono-revolution has become manifest as a meta-revolution, or Meta-revolution of Zuckerberg, which relates to a revolution of simulated and space itself, community, identity and governance in a meta-verse. The meta-verse is eventually a proto-simulacrum for God that is being rejected… and Being rejected. This counterfeit is caused by an induction by confusion produced by oscillation between silliness and terror. The meta idea purports to be beyond in mono-revolutionary deceit. The war on humanity and our nervous system by our own governments, with their cancerous corporate outgrowths from public funds, using and glorifying treachery to attain transnational re-alignment is the ongoing stage of the mono-revolution.

What we describe as revolution has largely been against Christian contexts with the notable exceptions of China. However Mao was rejecting the Chinese version of a heavenly order as well. In addition, the greatest revolt, the Taiping Rebellion, also challenged the existing conception of heaven with an unorthodox Christian mystical inspiration.

Mono-revolution is a consistent yet diverse political and metaphysical phenomenon or movement that manifests across history and cultures. It represents a trans-historical rebellion against monotheistic inspired governance especially in its apostolic Christian form but ultimately against the authority and legitimacy of God. Theologically and theoretically in the context of manifestation as an adversarial reaction, it originates in the primordial revolt of Satan or Lucifer. It embodies a cognitive, archetypal, conscious and unconscious disposition that challenges divine order, creation of humanity, and constraints on free will. It resists hierarchies claimed under God, particularly those upheld by Catholic and Orthodox churches, and instead elevates self-will, technique, empiricism, esotericism, evolution, and experience. The revolution involves a diminishing claim to divine justification until pretence of commitment to God is revealed to be empty and pursuit of Godlessness, a new God or gods is justified. Absent the Christian context it can indicate a revolt against the existing heavenly claim for governance.

The theoretical topography of mono-revolution

Mono-revolution in a modern context has a mass element but is largely about governance and that involves governors. Thus we usually have an elite or elect whose position derives from their sense of entitlement to govern. Often they have no legitimate claim save the vicarious suffering of others and their own pathological certainty. The elite elect themselves or claim higher authority often to oust the existing hierarchy. The nihilistic demeanour of revolutionaries depicted in Russia in the mid-19^th century was presented as a demonic possession by some. Rebellion against the moral law was inherent in the supposedly liberationary movement. But when we examine the life of John Knox (the Protestant Reformer) we see some of the same characteristics even if theonomic. He too goes to Geneva like many revolutionaries. He is zealous. He is fixed on governance. He hates the Catholic Church. He is antinomian. He wants to overthrow it. He is willing to incite violence. He claims a special elect status which justifies unilateral decisions. He is certain. He can galvanise a mass or mob. He sees the world in black and white. He uses the print media to publish propaganda. He is iconoclastic.

The pattern and purpose of the mono-revolution becomes clear even if not so obvious to the deluded intelligentsia that participate in certainty of their knowledge of good and evil as they re-define it. Contracting from the City of God or domain of the Holy Spirit and Christ to the spirit of nature and then spirit of knowledge of the material leads to a solely materialist plan of artificial re-creation by will. Non Serviam becomes - it is my will or that is my will - voluntas mea est. That must become voluntas mea contra tuam or - my will against yours. Eventually it must be - creabo mundum voluntate mea - I will create the world by my will. And none but I shall judge - non nisi ego iudicabo, because there is no will but mine - non est voluntas nisi mea. Whether you begin there or finish, you come to not God’s will but mine - non voluntas Dei, sed mea. This progression becomes abundantly clear if we look at it in Greek and contrast the Our Father with Aleister Crowley’s Do What Thou Wilt. This goes in Greek from γενηθήτω τὸ θέλημά σου - Thy will be done, to γενηθήτω τὸ θέλημά μου - my will be done. It looks very similar but it seems that cosmic reality is inverted by a mere pronoun change by one letter that appropriately points downwards. πλὴν οὐχ ὡς ἐγὼ θέλω, ἀλλ’ ὡς σύ - yet not as I will but you will. In Gethsemane, this is not merely a personal struggle but a cosmic manifesto. Who would have thought this juxtaposition reveals how powerful pronouns are in subversion?

The monomyth is associated with the retreat from monotruth or objective truth and value and monotheism. It is a simulacrum to facilitate the illusion that retreating into your sole desires to further your own interests or will is what your soul needs. It is manifest in kaleidoscopic meaning skating on thin ice. It is permanent revolution in metaphysics and logic. It is postmodernist, post-foundational and posthuman. However, founded on a contraction, that new construction must always be built on shifting sand, split already against itself. Then the only philosophy produced will be – if I’m going down I'm taking others or if I’m going down I’ll seize others - si descendam, alios capiam. Your acquiescence to the leadership of one who rejects a foundation of spiritual hierarchy especially when they know it exists means you will follow them. Destructive contagion is facilitated by conditioning and weakening of individual agency by blandishments. The earth is ruined by this attitude.

Movement of the mono-revolution in the end is not just to eradicate spiritual or divine revelation but humanity itself. It is no longer a divine creature or reflection but merely an impediment to the necessary unfolding of a definitive telos that the Promethean must make to satisfy their existential angst. Framed thus, transhumanism, posthumanism, Reformation, permanent revolution, communism, crony-capitalism, sorcerous esotericism, Gnosticism and AI worship make sense. AI is God, we will be like Gods, why would we obey dogma? And so on. Despite a consistent claim to universal spiritual jurisdiction and control over certain temporal matters, Christian monotheism has rarely resulted in theocratic or mono-governance without parallel state regulation, either in historically Christian nations or globally. Instead, the Church’s jurisdiction has often focused on securing authority over specific domains of moral and social life, most notably, marriage. By contrast, the mono-revolution involves a deeper aim. It implies not only a unified worldview but also informs a claim to global mono-governance, extending its reach beyond spiritual matters into the totality of political and societal structures. This derives from the post-colonial translation of empire into a global system enabled by transnational corporations, international regulatory and governing bodies and the converging networks that allow control. Look at Palantir.

Rejection of theism which is hierarchical in an antinomian way may appear to echo Christ, but fails to do so by undermining values of human dignity in relation to the divine that Jesus emphasised and which founds the modern critique itself. Jesus indicated the greatest would be a servant in this system. It is not a result of a biologically adaptive, evolutionary principle observable in lobsters, but inherent structure in the nature of spiritual consciousness and its fundamental origins. Certainly the Church itself can be fatally compromised. But the same system that provides the thesis invites the antithesis, Christ that gave rise to anti-Christ, contrasting with shadow anticipated this darkness within and its ultimate failure. We are asked to save ourselves from delusion and illusion and serve a revolution against God. If we go along with this, it must mean we are of the same spirit who said Non Serviam. Though Islam worships God it can be enlisted in the mono-revolution. Remember the British Empire once ruled half of all Muslims. Its new iteration will want it all. Note how Protestants have been and will be sacrificed as pawns for power almost totally by the institutions they have been loyal to for half a millennium.

In the Greatest Game, for control of human consciousness, the Catholic Church is a critical battlefield. Here we should distinguish between strategy and tactics like materialist globalists do. Within the Church there will a great fault-line. Formerly, in schism the inside went out. For quite a while the outside has come in and now the bad will seek to expel any good. Paradoxically that requires the faithful are not forced to be actual Protestants, claiming to be more-Catholic-than-the-Catholics themselves on the outside by leverage of a Protestant, esoteric, left-brained or materialistic zeal burrowed into the Church that is part of a wider Promethean disposition that reflects this mono-revolution. That is the challenge for traditionalists and conservatives where purist tactics will be a losing strategy, not for the specific soul or traditional ceremonies, but for general Church culture and control. Without being wise as serpents the genuine will be unceremoniously severed.

The spiritually or divine homeostatic aspect of Christ is indicated by the idea of a centre that holds, a gravitational or magnetic pull, a quietness and stillness, a cathedral space, a desert prayer, a monk’s cave, a nun’s convent or Elijah looking for God. It suggests a meekness, humility and receptivity not as quiescence or submission to man but to the divine in defiance of mundane force. Don’t give the eternal soul up for a laugh, cocktail, sporting event or a throng of bad actors who are not even genuine artists. The symbol and reality of opposition is the Virgin Mary, homeostatic, cosmically ordering, nurturing, submissive to the divine, receptive to the incarnated but not claiming to be its origin. She is force of homeostasis as invisible and mysterious as that which keeps your temperature constant now and regulates your fluid levels and insulin levels, your pancreas and so on. While you might be driven to act to change them, the underlying signalling mechanisms are involuntary and embedded. We take for given homeostasis in a fine-tuned universe without seeing it as a given grace. That carbon is critical for such a system is somehow ignored in the silicon love or recursion, simulation and control. This is the monomyth Joyce indicated. But he took the Yes of the Virgin and reduced it to the closed loop Yes of Molly Bloom in mere existential affirmation. Grace is spiritual homeostasis sacred and embodied in flesh and blood.

Omnia Gratiarum.